2011 Budget Cycle and Taxes Questions

First, it was my intent to hold a public forum on issues related to the 2011 budget, but due to the timing of the release of information, the scheduling of Budget reviews, and a trip to the Nation League of Cities Winter Meeting, so instead I am offering you two avenues of communication.

1)  Please check this website and I will be posting interesting analysis of the the 2011 Budget.

2)  Send me any question that you wish to have answered.  I will publish you question and answer on this site, so long as the question is respectful.

I am a pretty strong defender of the city budget and spending.  We have had some very high profile failures like the Skyway to Nowhere and the Rochester Convention & Visitors Bureau Fraud. But in reality better than 98% of the budget is clear and pretty uncontroversial.  We will see where the final numbers fall, but I expect that Rochester will be spending less real dollars per capita in 2011 than we did in 2001.  The primary cause of increases is the failure to Tim Pawlenty to honor his promise not to cut LGA.  If we could get our 2003 LGA amount adjusted for Growth, this same budget would lead to a massive property tax cut.

In Rochester we struggle to provide the infrastructure and services for 110,000 workers even though we only have only 43,000 households.  All of those additional people that come here for work do not help pay the bills except for a .005 portion of sales tax and some business taxes for those at for profit companies.  We citizens of Rochester continue to subsidize the rest of the region.  LGA was the only method to introduce fairness, but that has been slowly killed off.

One comment

  1. Before you jet off to denver, is that rally necessary by the way, a couple comments. The cities web site only included budget figures for 2007 to 2010 but those suggest that it wll be difficult to argue that there has been a reduction in total spending, and probably not per capita but I await your figures, detailed I assume. The argument that other workers leach from rochester is valid only if you forget that the roads are paid for in large part by the feds, state and county. Much of the other infrastructure is there to encourage others to shop in rochester, so you can eliminate it but I suspect it would not be accepted by those merchants, the non-tax paying workers you mention don’t just flee the city at 5 PM in total, they stop and shop, or come back to the bars and restaurants and other businesses. Continuing to whine about the loss of LGA is getting tiresome, suck it up and recognize it is gone. As far as the budget, why is there such a major increase in professional fees in the 2010 budget over 2007

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.